a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 1983). We have agents of this fraud going around the country fleecing the people under fraud, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, sometimes at the point of a gun, to take their hard earned cash and to make the elite rich beyond belief, while forcing good law abiding people to lose their livelihood, and soon to steal their very bank accounts to prop up the big banks once again. The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle. Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. If a "LAW" defines "Person" along with a corporation, that "Person" is a fiction and NOT a real, flesh and blood human. -American Mutual Liability Ins. Driving is an occupation. On June 30, 2021, the Assembly appointed five new judges to the Supreme Court, in violation of the process established in the constitution and the Assembly's own internal rules. I seen this because my brother, who is gullible to the extreme, kept ranting about Supreme court says no license necessary. House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. The public is a weird fiction. FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274 - CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. I have from time to time removed some commentsfrom the comments section,that were vicious personal attacks against an author, rather than an intelligent discussion of the issues,but veryrarely. If you truly believe this then you obviously have never learned what a scholarly source is. The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. in a crowded theater or that you can incite violence. 351, 354. Spotted something? 1983). Glover was in fact driving and was charged with driving as a habitual violator. We are here to arrive at the truth about what has been done to our country, and true history, not as we see it, but as our Creator sees it. ], United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. Some citations may be paraphrased. You'll find the quotes from the OP ignore the cases/context they are lifted from. Idc. Firms, Sample Letter re Trial Date for Traffic Citation. If you're a free nationalist or a sovereign citizen, if you choose to boycott not only state laws that you want to buy every state law, I'd respect you. The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions. Wake up! . Licensed privileges are NOT rights. GUEST, 383 U.S. 745, AT 757-758 (1966) , GRIFFIN VS. BRECKENRIDGE, 403 U.S. 88, AT 105-106 (1971) CALIFANO VS. TORRES, 435 U.S. 1, AT 4, note 6 . automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. SHAPIRO VS. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) CALIFANO VS. AZNAVORIAN, 439 U.S. 170, AT 176 (1978) Look the above citations up in American Jurisprudence. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. The justices vacated . 128, 45 L.Ed. Read the case! Select Accept to consent or Reject to decline non-essential cookies for this use. In respect to license and insurance I have to actually agree it should be required. Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27 RIGHT -- A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. (archived here). This is corruption. "We hold that when the officer lacks information negating an inference that the owner is the . Lead Stories is a U.S. based fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. The Supreme Court last month remanded a lower court's ruling that police officers who used excessive force on a 27-year-old man who died in their custody were protected because they didn't know their actions were unconstitutional. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 2 2 A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle. Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. You make these statements as if you know the law. See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends) and leave the link in the comments. 762, 764, 41 Ind. "The right to travel (called the right of free ingress to other states, and egress from them) is so fundamental that it appears in the Articles of Confederation, which governed our society before the Constitution." Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless., City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910. And be a decent person so when you hit my kid because you don't know how to drive because you never took training to get your license and he knew what do in a bike, I don't lose my entire life because you refuse to carry insurance. Bouviers Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961. It only means you can drive on YOUR property without a license. App. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.. 848; O'Neil vs. Providence Amusement Co., 108 A. endstream endobj 943 0 obj <>/Metadata 73 0 R/Outlines 91 0 R/Pages 936 0 R/StructTreeRoot 100 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 944 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj 945 0 obj <>stream A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use. Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 1 1 U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH. With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a Right secured or protected by that document cannot be overthrown or impaired by any state police authority. Donnolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US 540; Lafarier vs. Grand Trunk R.R. I do invite everyone to comment as they see fit, but follow a few simple rules. Supreme Court Most Recent Decisions BITTNER v. UNITED STATES No. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. This case was not about driving. I would also look up the definition of "Traffic". There is no supreme court ruling confirming or denying a "right to drive" Without this requirement, the state puts themselves in legal jeopardy because the constituents can sue the state for not sufficiently vetting persons operating vehicles to make sure they were aware that the person who just killed 20 people was not capable of operating said vehicle safely. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. To infringe on anyone else's safety is NOT what Jesus intended. When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. California v. Texas. Here is the relevant case law, affirmed by SCOTUS. Copy and paste and can't understand what you read and interpret it to be an "infringement" because you don't want to do it. 22. You're actually incorrect, do some searching as I am right now. The United States Constitution provides the legal basis for many of the rights American citizens enjoy. 662, 666. If you need an attorney, find one right now. Share to Linkedin. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456, "The word automobile connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways." If you drive without a license and insurance and you cause an accident on public roads, you are LIABLE and can be sued and put in jail. The decision stated: Matson v. Dawson, 178 N.W. H|KO@=K No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. You don't think they've covered that? Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.". He specialized in covering complex major issues, such as health insurance, the opioid epidemic and Big Pharma. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) The right to travel (called the right of free ingress to other states, and egress from them) is so fundamental that it appears in the Articles of Confederation, which governed our society before the Constitution.. Another bit of context elided from the example article is the fact that in when the referenced decision was handed down by the Supreme Court of Virginia in 1930, several of the 48 states did not yet require motorists to possess driver's licenses to operate motor vehicles on public roads. The Economic Club of Southwestern Michigan, Benton Harbor, MI, September 23 . Matson v. Dawson, 178 N.W. You can update your choices at any time in your settings. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 3 "The word 'operator' shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation." . WASHINGTON The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that a Pennsylvania school district had violated the First Amendment by punishing a student for a vulgar social media message sent while she. Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases. Id., at 197. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . The We Are Change site, which posted the original claim, says it is, a "nonpartisan, independent media organization comprised of individuals and groups working to expose corruption worldwide.". "The Supreme Court Has Spoken: The Affordable Care Act Is the Law of the Land," was the title of a statement from the Democratic group Protect Our Care, founded to fight GOP repeal efforts in. It has NOTHING to do with your crazy Sovereign Citizen BS. I wonder when people will have had enough. Notice it says "private automobile" can be regulated, not restricted to commerce. 21-1195 argued date: November 2, 2022 decided date: February 28, 2023 DELAWARE v. PENNSYLVANIA No. Posted byPaul Stramerat11:31 PM52 comments:Email This, Labels:Anna von Reitz,Catholic Faith,Paul Stramer. 6, 1314. The Supreme Court on Thursday narrowed the scope of a federal cybercrime law, holding that a policeman who improperly accessed a license plate database could not be charged under the law.. The email address cannot be subscribed. I have my family have been driving vehicles on public Highways and Street without a Driver's license or license plate for 50 plus years now, Everyone in my family has been pulled over and yes cited for not having these things, but they have all had these Citations thrown out because the fact that the U.S. Constitution Clearly Statement that and Long as you are not using your vehicle for commerce (e.i. Automotive vehicles are lawful means of conveyance and have equal rights upon the streets with horses and carriages. ; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference is a fundamental constitutional right -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. Only when it suits you. Elated gun rights advocates say the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen has opened the door to overturning many other state gun restrictions. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business." See some links below this article for my comments on this and related subjects. SCOTUS has several about licensing in order to drive though. The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions. Your arguing and trying to stir more conspiracies and that's the problem. Donnolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US 540; Lafarier vs. Grand Trunk R.R. 6, 1314. In other words, the court held that although the use of public roads is a right which citizens enjoy, local authorities may nonetheless regulate such use (including imposing a requirement that motor vehicle operators obtain licenses) so long as such regulations are reasonable, not arbitrary, and apply equally to everyone. A Kansas deputy sheriff ran a license plate check on a pickup truck, dis-covering that the truck belonged to respondent Glover and that Glover's driver's license had been revoked. Words matter. She shared a link to We Are Change from July 21, 2015, under the title "U.S. SUPREME COURT SAYS NO LICENSE NECESSARY TO DRIVE AUTOMOBILE ON PUBLIC ROADS." 376, 377, 1 Boyce (Del.) In Thompson v Smith - SCOTUS Bottom line - REAL, flesh and blood humans have a right to travel WITHOUT permission or a license. Go to 1215.org. Created byFindLaw's team of legal writers and editors Gun safety advocates, however, emphasize that the court's ruling was limited in scope and still allows states to regulate types of firearms, where people . Both have the right to use the easement. Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that motorists need not have licenses to drive vehicles on public roads. Generally . Learn more in our Cookie Policy. 2d 639. The decision comes as President Joe. No recent Supreme Court ruling has in any way challenged the legality of a requirement for driver's licenses. You think Paul here went out and took off his plates and went driving, NO. supreme court ruled in 2015 driver license are not need to travel in USA so why do states still issues licenses. . K. AGAN. VS. I was pulled over last night I was doing speed limit and cop said I was 48 miles in 35 but my car was on cruise control on 38 miles a hour which was clocked by a police radar set on road it said 38 two miles down the road he said I was doing 38 I refused to show my driver licence and asked for a supervisor the supervisor said if he comes out I am going to jail cop refused to give me a print out on the radar and arrested me for not giving my licence and charged me with resisting arrest without violence bogus charge did not resist got bad neck they couldn't get my arms to go back far enough I told them I have a bad neck my arms don't go back that far they kept trying so now I have serious neck pain. That decision said life without parole should be reserved for "the rarest of juvenile offenders, those . The exercise of such a common right the city may, under its police power, regulate in the interest of the public safety and welfare; but it may not arbitrarily or unreasonably prohibit or restrict it, nor may it permit one to exercise it and refuse to permit another of like qualifications, under like conditions and circumstances, to exercise it. The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation., Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. They said that each person shall have the LIBERTY provided in the 5th AMENDMENT to travel from state to state on the INTERSTATE with the full protection of DUE PROCESS! Delete my comment. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances., Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. ----- -----ARGUMENT I. 241, 246; Molway v. City of Chicago, 88 N.E. 376, 377, 1 Boyce (Del.) The fact-checking site Snopes knocked the alleged ruling down, back in 2015, shortly after it began circulating. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. 3d 213 (1972). 41. & Telegraph Co. v Yeiser 141 Kentucy 15. In fact, during the 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 events combined, Clerks of Court held more than 200 events and helped more than 35,000 . If you have a suspended license and outstanding fines, Operation Green Light could be your ticket to getting back behind the wheel. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456 The word automobile connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways., -American Mutual Liability Ins. Truth is truth and conspiracy theories and purposeful spreading of misinformation is shameful on all of you. The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions. No recent Supreme Court ruling has in any way challenged the legality of a requirement for driver's licenses. 157, 158. "The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts." It includes the right in so doing to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day; and under the existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse-drawn carriage or wagon thereon, or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purposes of life and business. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. Salvadoran. App. When anyone is behind the wheel of a vehicle capable of causing life-changing injury and/or death it is the right of the state to protect everyone else from being hurt or killed and them have no financial responsibility or even if they are able to be sued never pay. The validity of restrictions on the freedom of movement of particular individuals, both substantively and procedurally, is precisely the sort of matter that is the peculiar domain of the courts. Comment, 61 Yale L.J. 186. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516, Willis vs. Buck, 263 P. l 982; Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82 The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived., Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. 9Sz|arnj+pz8" lL;o.pq;Q6Q bBoF{hq* @a/ ' E 762, 764, 41 Ind. 2d 588, 591. at page 187. Anything that is PUBLIC doesn't have that "right". Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles. If you need an attorney, find one right now. The Southern Poverty Law Center has dubbed the group a "conspiracy-obsessed 'Patriot' organization" that delves into radical far-right conspiracies while trying to mask itself as a moderate group. 1, the 'For The People Act', which aims to counter restrictive state voting . The thinking goes, If the Supreme Court says it's a right to use the highway, the state can't require me to get a license and then grant me permission to drive, because it's already my right . Who is a member of the public? It is the LAW. Operation Green Light helps customers save money and get back on the road. hbbd``b`n BU6 b;`O@ BDJ@Hl``bdq0 $ If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet. The Decision Below Undermines Law Enforcement's Efforts To Promote Public Safety. Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. No matter which state you live in, you are required by law to have a valid driver's license and all endorsements needed for the type of vehicle you are operating, e.g., motorcycle endorsements, commercial vehicle endorsements, etc.Driving without a valid licensecan result in significant charges. The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle., Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. Each citizen has the absolute right to choose for himself the mode of conveyance he desires, whether it be by wagon or carriage, by horse, motor or electric car, or by bicycle, or astride of a horse, subject to the sole condition that he will observe all those requirements that are known as the law of the road. Swift v City of Topeka, 43 U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 4 Kansas 671, 674. %PDF-1.6 % He 157, 158. if someone is using a car, they are traveling. Saying "well that's just the law" is what's wrong with the people in this country. . U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS. ; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784, " the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference is a fundamental constitutional right" -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. Like the right of association, it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all." ), 8 F.3d 226, 235" 19A Words and Phrases - Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94. 887. Contact a qualified traffic ticket attorney to help you get the best result possible. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159; Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. The Supreme Court agreed to hear a major Second Amendment dispute that could settle whether the Constitution protects a right to carry guns in public. The Supreme Court NEVER said that. 942 0 obj <> endobj 20-979 Patel v. Garland (05/16/2022) had previously checked a box on a Georgia driver's license application falsely stating that he was a United States. The courts say you are wrong. You will see a big picture as to how they have twisted the laws to do this to us. Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. Most people do not have the financial ability and even if they did wouldn't alot money to you because you were hurt. How about some comments on this? Answer (1 of 4): I went to Supreme Court of the United States and searched for the topic of 'drivers license,' and receive this result: Supreme Court of the United States So, it does appear some people have sued over losing their State drivers' license, and taken their case all the way to the U.. 465, 468. 3rd 667 (1971) The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. So if you refuse to read the 10th AMENDMENT to see that in our Bill of Rights that it says anything not specifically laid out in the constitution is up to the states to decide. Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. But I have one question, are you a Law Enforcement Officer, a JUDGE, a, District Attorney, or a Defense Attorney. This site might have references but I read all of the stuff I said to in the beginning nowhere did it say driving is a right! For example, you have a right tofree speech, but that does not mean you can yell Fire!" Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions: (6) Motor vehicle. Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 205; See also: Christy v. Elliot, 216 Ill. 31; Ward v. Meredith, 202 Ill. 66; Shinkle v. McCullough, 116 Ky. 960; Butler v. Cabe, 116 Ark. The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances." Because the consequences for operating a vehicle poorly or without adequate training could harm others, it is in everyone's best interest to make sure the people with whom you share the road know what they are doing. "The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 185. Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83 "Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen." - The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways", 10) The term "used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit. United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. Snopes cited the fuller context of the ruling, which said: -Thompson vs. Smith, supra. Why do you feel the inclination to lie to people? The foreign corporation we call government uses transliteration and bastardization of the Amercian/English language to manipulate and control their serfs, slaves, subjects and servants called United States Citizens, Incorporated. Talk to a lawyer and come back to reality. (Paul v. Virginia). "With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a Right secured or protected by that document cannot be overthrown or impaired by any state police authority." Hendrick v. Maryland235 US 610 (1915) The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it., Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273. ], U.S. v Bomar, C.A.5(Tex. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 3 The word operator shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation., Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83 Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen. Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27 RIGHT A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. The fact-checking site Snopes knocked the alleged ruling down, back in 2015, shortly after it began circulating. "Traffic infractions are not a crime." That does not mean in a social compact you get to disregard them. to make money or profit) then you don't need a license to travel within the United States, also if that is the case, then you would need a driver's license and insurance to even purchase a vehicle. Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases. Id., at 197. Some people interpret this right as meaning that they do not need a driver's license to operate a vehicle on public roadways, but do state and federal laws agree with that interpretation?